I drew a blank. The scene I was writing this week demanded a vivid analogy. A metaphor. A simile. Anything but a simple adjective. And I could think of nothing. So, I wondered if an artificial intelligence content generator could crack open my writer’s block. I typed this prompt into ChatGPT:
Complete this descriptive sentence: Feeling hopeful for the first time in years, I turned to him like …
In exactly one second, I received this response: Feeling hopeful for the first time in years, I turned to him like a lost sailor spotting a lighthouse on a stormy night.
Perfect! I wish I had thought of that myself.
Now, comes the writer’s moral dilemma. Is it cheating to use this AI-generated sentence in my novel?
As I started typing the simile into my doc, I felt a twinge of guilt, as if I had looked up the answers to today’s crossword puzzle and couldn’t unsee the words and pretend that I had completed the puzzle all by myself. Would I admit to my writer’s group that I did not create that image? Would I publish a sentence that did not come from my own creative juices?
While I worried over this ethical dilemma, I reflected back on my earlier writing – back before ChatGPT. My blogs postings have, most often, been reflections about my writing career in an era long gone. So, reflecting on my writing before AI, I wondered if I had ever published writing that was not entirely my own. The answer surprised me.
You bet I did! Every time I took a suggestion from someone in my writer’s group that improved my sentence, or my descriptive attempt, or my dialogue, I added words to my story that were not my own. In fact, every time I accepted suggested changes from spellcheck or Grammarly, or right-clicked for a synonym, I was using AI to bring my writing to a higher level.
But where is the line between “a little help” and unethical pretense?
In response to a flood of AI-created novels, Amazon recently added a disclaimer requirement to its KDP self-publishing program. When self-publishing on Amazon, authors are now asked to declare whether or not the work was produced with the assistance of an AI content generator. So, now I wonder if I must move my novel into the AI-created category because I love the sailor/lighthouse analogy and will insert it into my story.
What do you think?
This is the kind of question that our community of writers needs to discuss and answer.
Slippery slope ( for all of us). Does one analogy lead to two…to several paragraphs? “Cheating” aside, will our only contribution be what we ask of AI while they do all the real work? Tough issue!
Different if you’d get from discussing with people. Similar but not tainted.